When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations
Larissa D. Meier, Jan M. Dollbaum, Priska Daphi and Sebastian Haunss | 2025
Works on protest counter-protest dynamics tend to assume that protesters and counter-protesters make competing claims about the same issue. This paper challenges this basic assumption. Based on an original dataset on local protests in Germany, it demonstrates that events that trigger a counter-protest and the response event, that is, the counter-protest, differ significantly in the issues they address. While a range of issues elicit counter-protests, the response events generally mobilize around anti-far-right claims, even if the initial protest does not explicitly advance fascism/racism issues. We argue that the observed asymmetry results from the way counter-protests have historically emerged as a specific repertoire used by left-wing actors to oppose fascist/racist groups and claims.
Publications
- Date
- 10.11.2025
- Language
- English
- Publication Type
- Journal article
- Audience
- Scientists (opens in new window)
- Sources
- Meier, Larissa D., Jan M. Dollbaum, Priska Daphi, and Sebastian Haunss. 2025. When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations. In: American Behavioral Scientist, November 10.
- Open Access
- Available
- Additional Links
- To the publication (external link)



